[Quark2005]

[sarcasm] You realize that all the sources mentioned in your references are in on the conspiracy behind the forgery, you know.[/sarcasm]

I'm sure it took you a lot more time to find those accurate references than it took to say "Archaeopteryx is a hoax". I'm sure you'll have another accusation of hoax thrown at you again as a result, which you'll have to put more work into to debunk. These kind of "scatter-shot" attacks, which take little effort on the part of those who initiate them, are the reason I usually don't like to talk science with creationists.

I usually like to know what someone thinks about the age of the earth before I start talking evolution with them, anyway. Anyone who thinks scientific evidence points to a 6000 year-old earth has even deeper problems with scientific literacy & isn't even ready for Evolution 101 yet.

[Just mythoughts]

"I usually like to know what someone thinks about the age of the earth before I start talking evolution with them, anyway. Anyone who thinks scientific evidence points to a 6000 year-old earth has even deeper problems with scientific literacy & isn't even ready for Evolution 101 yet."


I haven't come across anyone who can state with certainty the age of this earth. Estimation is the closest I seen produced. By the way for the anti-Creator bunch the Bible does NOT say the age of this earth, I know cause I read it.