Replies

The analogy is a good one. ID supporters are deniers of science.

Actually we're deniers of "JUNK science."

Tell you what, you name for me one single "missing link" that's been "discovered" that hasn't been proven to be a hoax and I'll buy into your "theory" of evolution.
Show me ONE, JUST ONE, single piece of evidence that anything in this physical realm has "evolved" from anything else (just so you know. I'll not accept the BS lies that adaptation "is" evolution. You and I both know that is total crap) and I'll buy into your "junk science" theories.
SHOW ME the 4 or 5 million year old laboratories that have been collecting the "data" that you all use to draw your BS conclusions.

And one more thing... stop pretending that Biologists buy into your ilk's junk science. REAL Biologists want nothing to do with your BS theories and "junk science."

JMHO

Tell you what, you name for me one single "missing link" that's been "discovered" that hasn't been proven to be a hoax and I'll buy into your "theory" of evolution.

Here's a whole bunch. Welcome to the rational world:

Post 661: Ichneumon's stunning post on transitionals.

Tell you what, you name for me one single "missing link" that's been "discovered" that hasn't been proven to be a hoax and I'll buy into your "theory" of evolution.

Since you seem so convinced that all current fossil offerings have been "discovered" to be hoaxes, perhaps you could provide, say, ten examples?

Show me ONE, JUST ONE, single piece of evidence that anything in this physical realm has "evolved" from anything else (just so you know.

Why? You'll just claim that it's a hoax. It's not like physical evidence hasn't been offered up countless times previously in these discussions.

I'll not accept the BS lies that adaptation "is" evolution.

So when confronted with facts that you don't like, you simply deny them. How...unsurprising.

SHOW ME the 4 or 5 million year old laboratories that have been collecting the "data" that you all use to draw your BS conclusions.

If you have a problem with the conclusions of biologists, perhaps you could actually name specific issues rather than just ranting and raving with nothing more than vague assertions?

And one more thing... stop pretending that Biologists buy into your ilk's junk science. REAL Biologists want nothing to do with your BS theories and "junk science."

Ah, so the hundreds of thousands of researchers who accept the theory of evolution aren't "REAL" biologists. A convenient way to "prove" that your opponents have no legitimate researchers on their side: redefine anyone who does accept the theory of evolution as "fake".

Do you have any facts to offer, or just empty rhetoric and hyperbole?

Tell you what, you name for me one single "missing link" that's been "discovered" that hasn't been proven to be a hoax

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/15000.html

Show me ONE, JUST ONE, single piece of evidence that anything in this physical realm has "evolved" from anything else (just so you know. I'll not accept the BS lies that adaptation "is" evolution. You and I both know that is total crap

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

And one more thing... stop pretending that Biologists buy into your ilk's junk science. REAL Biologists want nothing to do with your BS theories and "junk science."

Over 99% of biologists accept the theory of evolution.

If you knew what science was, you'd know that ID is a claassic example of junk. The laboratory is more than 4 or 5 million years old. It's the fossil record and it goes back farther than hundred times 4 or 5 million years. Each new fossil discovered fits a predicted pattern. Each living thing is a transitional fossil, whose smallest transitional gap is a single generation, a parent-offspring transition. What is youjr alternative and what is the evidence for it?

And, based on your vitriol, I know you have never actually met, let alone talked with, a bonafide biologist.