Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
I am not 'persistently refusing' anything.

I apologize for asserting that. I didn't read the whole thread, and only picked up your response to my post.

Here is another description of the process, also on the DHS National Response Plan website.

Emphasis on Local Response

All incidents are handled at the lowest possible organizational and jurisdictional level. Police, fire, public health and medical, emergency management, and other personnel are responsible for incident management at the local level. For those events that rise to the level of an Incident of National Significance, the Department of Homeland Security provides operational and/or resource coordination for Federal support to on-scene incident command structures.

Proactive Federal Response to Catastrophic Events

The National Response Plan provides mechanisms for expedited and proactive Federal support to ensure critical life-saving assistance and incident containment capabilities are in place to respond quickly and efficiently to catastrophic incidents. These are high-impact, low-probability incidents, including natural disasters and terrorist attacks that result in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the population, infrastructure, environment, economy, national morale, and/or government functions.

http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0569.xml
Local/Federal Response Strategies & Coordination Structure

I note the use of the word "support" in "expedited and proactive Federal support," and not the word "takeover."

821 posted on 09/05/2005 7:03:31 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies ]


Cite to the Stafford Act, for the record and for any curious. It is a self-contained reference. I don't know if there is a similar reference for the CFR (administrative rules) aspect of this act. If so, will post a link to that as well.

http://www.fema.gov/library/stafact.shtm <- Very dry reading

823 posted on 09/05/2005 7:09:20 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt; lugsoul; EBH
Thank you for trying to hash this out. I'm sure we'll hear exactly this argument in the coming days, and by having looked at it here first it helps me to bat down the nonsense spewed by my circle of lib acquaintances
1,124 posted on 09/05/2005 10:00:49 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson