People with cars, that is. So once again, there is no plan for those without resources and who now live in another state to be given the same opportunity.
C'mon. Your comment reminds me of Churchill's quote about "the vice of capitalism is an unequal share of the blessings, while the virtue of communism is an equal share of the misery." It sounds like you want to prevent those with the ability to start recovering their lives from doing so, until there is an equal share of misery.
And I'm not sure this plan letting people go back is a good idea. Wasn't a fortune just spent getting people OUT? Some of these people are going to be tempted to stay, especially in the sections that have electricity.
While you see these images all on the same TV screen, they are occurring miles apart. The misery index is not uniform across the region. And to answer you point about people leaving again, I would just say that those, returning with cars, are the most likely to depart again, because they a) have current mobility; b) probably have the financial wherewithall and skills to want to seek to rebuilt their lives as quickly as possible. It is only humane to let people attempt to salvage a few mementos from their lives before moving on.
I'll leave it to the doctors to decide if it is medically safe to let people remain, if the water and electricity are restored.
So when we notice that NO actually no plan for people without resources we're now called Communists? LOL.