Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cedar

That is correct. The Stafford Act is a mechanism by which the States can request federal funding to supplement disaster relief operations. The actual physical implementation of disaster relief operations is a responsibility of the States or Territories, such as Guam and Puerto Rico. Each State or Region has a FEMA director charged with coordinating with local officials to support disaster relief functions. Ultimately, however, the disaster reponsibilities reside with local governments, not FEMA. In the case of the Gulf States affected by Katrina, the Governors of those States are responsible for actions in their States with respect to disaster operations. With the exception of the Coast Guard, all deployed active and non-active military personnel deployed to support the States to mitigate the effects of Hurricane Katrina report through the chain of command to the Governors of each State. Since the Coast Guard was transferred to the Federal Homeland Security Department previously under the auspices of the Stafford Act, they report directly to the current Director of that Department, unless they are deployed outside of US Territorial waters as directed by the President or the Congress. An exception to those general rules for example would be in the Great Lakes were we share a border and vital shipping lanes from Lake Superior to the Atlantic with Canada. Thus, Canada and the USA share responsibility for the protection of those vital assets via longstanding treaties between the two countries.


698 posted on 09/05/2005 12:41:11 AM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies ]


To: gpapa

Thank you for your clarifying post. Breaks it down well on the actual chain of command.


902 posted on 09/05/2005 8:07:13 AM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies ]

To: gpapa; podkane

Confusion once again. Would you mind reading comments by podkane and commenting? (Or anyone else here who has thoughts on this, please comment). Apparently after 9/11 President did intervene. Thanks.

Here's the post:

Turns out she did ask him - Aug. 27... but even if she hadn't, the POTUS has the authority to send the NG without governors' permission - he did so immediately after 911...

GWB had an excellent plan in place by last year... go to the DHS website:

http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NRPbaseplan.pdf

problem was, it wasn't executed. Bush's advisers should step aside, and let Bush's natural leadership shine - he can fire the head of FEMA, who shouldn't have to wait on inept local politicians when a monumental disaster is about to occur. Using the obvious (i.e., the LA authorities were not up to the task) as an excuse for not taking charge himself, makes him look weak. Taking charge of chaotic situations that overwhelm state and local authorities is FEMA's whole reason for exisiting. To outsiders, it puts the admin. down on the level of Nagin or Blanco - just more politicians finger pointing.


65 posted on 09/05/2005 11:41:52 AM CDT by podkane


1,209 posted on 09/05/2005 10:44:20 AM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson