Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolomoninSouthDakota

Lost its structural integrity.


3,077 posted on 09/05/2005 7:32:59 PM PDT by BurbankKarl (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3055 | View Replies ]


To: BurbankKarl
"Lost its structural integrity."

Thanks for listing the reason.

But I just find it implausible that the Superdome must be torn down. prior to the storm weren't they saying it was designed for winds greater than the 165 mph? I think an analogy to an old oak tree is fitting. It came through these winds (weren't the top gusts @ 150, steady winds at @110?). Sure it's a mess and would take much to clean and repair the roof. But that effort would be less than a drop in a bucket compared to first of all DEMOLISHING and the REBUILDING.
I would guess we will see two factions rising: one wanting to see the city restored to what it pretty much was--only better--and the other for just restoring the historical parts, the refineries and ports, and commercial parts.
I wonder if the faction for minimal restoration are making a quick push to demolish the landmark.
3,125 posted on 09/05/2005 7:59:46 PM PDT by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3077 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson