Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

In this case why would Blanco retaining control over the Louisiana National Guard impede the feds from helping? I guess I'm trying to figure out what Bush's side of the story in all this might be.


1,901 posted on 09/05/2005 1:45:55 PM PDT by owl37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1800 | View Replies ]


To: owl37

There have been radio comms with the US military authorities clashing with the National Guard commanders...there have been several run ins actually.


1,933 posted on 09/05/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by BurbankKarl (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies ]

To: owl37
In this case why would Blanco retaining control over the Louisiana National Guard impede the feds from helping? I guess I'm trying to figure out what Bush's side of the story in all this might be.

Bush's side is that the feds can do ONLY what they are told or asked to do. The feds don't tell the state what to do.

As to why Blanco would not admit Nat'l Guard (under her control) into NOLA, the reason that the officials on-site gave to the Red Cross was that there was a state of civil unrest. Rescuers could be shot by thugs. The governor said publicy that the effort was going fine, but on the ground, the message was "don't go in there."

It's up to the state apparatus first, to asses situation and request appropriate assistance.

1,935 posted on 09/05/2005 1:51:25 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies ]

To: owl37

Get your nick from Harry Potter... delivering the messages?


2,005 posted on 09/05/2005 2:06:44 PM PDT by publana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson