Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
No offense, but I'd trust her clues more than yours.

Fairly typical of the rest of your posts; an assessment you've pulled out of thin air? Based on hearsay? Because she said so?

For one thing, she backed up her position with facts, which is more than I can say for you. We're getting close to 200 posts on this thread, and still not a single one of her detractors has yet to address any of the facts she laid down. It's quite telling.

She has no facts...yet, your bloviating notwithstanding. She has snipped some quotes from a few people under a lot of stress in an attempt to do what? Make a splash? To gain more face time on the teevee. Since her timing is incredible, I suspect her motives also.....FWIW.

FGS

239 posted on 09/04/2005 11:25:07 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake
She has snipped some quotes from a few people under a lot of stress in an attempt

Now this is interesting. Are quotes from people "under stress" to be dismissed as having no evidentiary value at all? Call me old-fashioned, but when someone admits to flubbing his job, as Brown did when he admitted that he had underestimated the force of the hurricane when the National Weather Service was predicting something much more serious, that's an admission against interest to be taken very seriously. I can bet some sweet money that you'd be taking it seriously if this was an official in a Democrat administration making that statement.

243 posted on 09/04/2005 11:31:42 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson