Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This may cause some unhappiness. I am a life-long conservative and have not voted RAT since Adlai Stevenson in 1956.
1 posted on 09/04/2005 7:53:24 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last
To: shrinkermd

"This may cause some unhappiness. I am a life-long conservative and have not voted RAT since Adlai Stevenson in 1956."

Is this perhaps senile dementia setting in? I turned one in 1956, so I suppose you could say I don't know much about the politics of the era, but I suspect Stevenson would be considered far-right by most of today's liberals.

I think my major objection to this idea is that Clinton is most assuredly not anyone I'd want to see on THAT bench, ever. Not to mention that he's disbarred. Poor choice for Supreme Justice, IMO. I don't mind the current administration using him as the liberal poster-child for bipartisanship, but I don't ever want to see him in a substantial official position again. Has-been he is, has-been he needs to stay.


187 posted on 09/04/2005 12:33:15 PM PDT by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

I'd love to see W nominate Clinton. The Borking would be sooo much fun.


190 posted on 09/04/2005 12:53:37 PM PDT by I see my hands (Until this civil war heats up.. have a nice day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

ROTFLMAO...he couldn't get past the "to tell the truth" part of the oath.


191 posted on 09/04/2005 12:56:59 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
How about this: there is nothing "partisan" about being able to read. The ONLY, let me repeat, ONLY, qualification for being a USSC justice is that you can read the Constitution.

Clinton flunks. He missed the "abuse of power" part.

192 posted on 09/04/2005 1:01:59 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

OUTSTANDING IDEA! Appoint him and then let CONGRESS impeach and remove him as they should have done years ago. And while they are at it, IMPEACH AND REMOVE THE REST!
Leave Thomas, Scalia, and Rehnquist and restrict their jurisdiction to Original jurisdiction cases only.


193 posted on 09/04/2005 1:10:44 PM PDT by Constitution Restoration Act
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Wow.

It's been more than 5 hours and about 200 posts since this zot-brained idea was posted.

Due to the fact he has been a FReeper since 1999, I suppose the mods are being nice and decided not to zot him.

Lord knows if I (since April) or any other newbie had posted this, we have have been spitting ozone.

194 posted on 09/04/2005 1:21:31 PM PDT by Responsibility1st (Figure out what you would die for...then live for it. -Anne Rivers Siddons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
You have lost your ever loving mind. Bill Clinton was never a centrist and George Bush would never appoint him.

Are you just lonely and need people to talk to and this is your way of making it happen?????????
195 posted on 09/04/2005 1:37:01 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Why would you want to inflict that sociopath on America again? Wasn't eight years enough? Bush and the country are still reeling from with the wreck he made of this country's security. Think Able Danger. Think Sandy Burglar. Think 9/11. China and all those technological secrets handed over for political contributions. Good grief. You must be joking.


198 posted on 09/04/2005 2:56:52 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Are you off yer meds?


199 posted on 09/04/2005 2:58:11 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Life is short, dance nekkid and wiggle your butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Aieeeeeee!!!

I'm sure you'll get some interesting responses.

: )
202 posted on 09/04/2005 3:19:35 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

I'm sorry shrinker, does your family know?


204 posted on 09/04/2005 4:27:50 PM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

If memory serves me correctly, wasn't he like...

DISBARRED!!!!!!


206 posted on 09/04/2005 5:11:23 PM PDT by Muzzle_em (I'm an island awash in a sea of stupidity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
I do believe Clinton began as a centrist in his party and did sign the welfare reform bill and so forth.

Wrong. He moved toward the center for political expediency, but he is a leftist at heart. The only reason he signed the welfare reform bill is because the Republicans outmanuevered him.

No, your idea is wrong and bad and ill conceived. That's my opinion.

207 posted on 09/04/2005 5:17:24 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

I think you need to sober up.


208 posted on 09/04/2005 5:19:43 PM PDT by John Lenin (Liberalism: Where shame is a virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

I nominate yours as the stoopidest idea of the year.


210 posted on 09/04/2005 5:23:09 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Is it possible someone could have "looted" some nics? Only murraymom would have an orgasm if this happened.


211 posted on 09/04/2005 5:33:24 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Why Bill Clinton when Barney Frank is available?


212 posted on 09/04/2005 5:36:08 PM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

How about making clinton Chief Justice of SCOTUS and Secretary General of the UN at the same time. Then he could finish the work of aligning our Constitution with international law and custom.

"Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool."


213 posted on 09/04/2005 6:55:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
Sure you are a conservative! Clinton is not only a Marxist liberal, he is a criminal. This you want for the court? Be real.
214 posted on 09/04/2005 7:21:07 PM PDT by ladyinred (Leftist=Anti American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

Didn't Clinton lose his law license?


215 posted on 09/04/2005 7:22:11 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson