Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Williams details 'American Hiroshima'
worldnetdaily ^ | September 3, 2005 | Ryan Mauro

Posted on 09/04/2005 3:05:03 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: lentulusgracchus
And stick troglodyticus in there anywhere after sapiens.
41 posted on 09/04/2005 5:28:22 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Setting off a so-called "dirty bomb", or a bunch of 1-2kT "suitcase bombs", would just piss us off.

According to the earlier linked stories, OBL figured that one out and has bypassed that threat level and gone directly to attempting to manufacture military-yield weapons in the 10-15kt range, roughly equivalent to the Hiroshima bomb (hence the project name). The reference to Hiroshima is propagandistic and intended to reflect the onus back on the U.S. Government, for having used those weapons during World War II.

Practical effects of a 10-kt weapon, if detonated at some optimum height above ground (say, atop a big building): basically nonsurvivable within about 1.2 miles, massive destruction and relatively low survivability (~25% survive at least into the postattack period) out to about 2 miles. Blast wave velocities over 250 mph instantaneous close to Ground Zero.

At 2 miles, most buildings remain standing and occupants not located next to windows will probably survive if they leave the area immediately and don't get caught in firestorms and aren't irradiated heavily by fallout. Persons near windows will be burned and then cut by flying glass; blast wave velocity will be approximately 70mph.

Over four miles, minimal effects on persons indoors except for fallout. Light damage to buildings and vehicles. And pandemonium, civil disorder, loss of services, etc.

There will be other effects, such as immobilization of vehicles with computerized ignitions by EMP and destruction of computer equipment by same. I've no idea about ranges and severity of EMP effects.

Search the Net for "weapons effects" and some combination of keywords.

42 posted on 09/04/2005 5:52:44 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

They're big enough to take out a stadium.

And a dirty bomb, depending on the radioactive substance, could make a downtown area of a city uninhabitable for years.

Small explosions, big impact. Just sayin'...


43 posted on 09/04/2005 5:57:29 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The more I find out about looters, the more I like my firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

Have you lookad at the border issue lately?

It's totally out of control. Yes, the FBI has open files on lots of Islamic people living among us, but can they prevent something like this? We have an army of ACLU lawyers who prevent any real cleanup from being done before the fact. And, the bureaucrats in intel still exist in an atmosphere of competition and internal turf wars.

If we weren't so internally weakened by the leftist infiltration of the last 50 years, I would agree with you more readily.


44 posted on 09/04/2005 6:03:07 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The more I find out about looters, the more I like my firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
OBL figured that one out and has bypassed that threat level and gone directly to attempting to manufacture military-yield weapons in the 10-15kt range

Oh, yeah.

Last I heard, he'd rounded up a task force of goatherds and they were going to build a Trident submarine with 240 independently-targetable warheads.

Now we're really screwed!

45 posted on 09/04/2005 6:43:48 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF
I keep hoping that the CIA is just a cover organization - the public face of American intelligence that exists only for public consumption and that somewhere out there is a real intelligence agency without a name, without an official headquarters, without a public budget and without a bunch of lilly livered bureaucrats screwing up everything they try to do.

I think it's called the NSA

46 posted on 09/04/2005 6:54:38 AM PDT by Clink ("Government is not the solution, government is the problem".--Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
One thing for sure...Katrina has shown

If you live in an urban area...don't

And you are responsible for yourself and your loved ones....

Find those like minded neighbors...from your church or other
organizations and make a plan and gather survival supplies..

More is better...
47 posted on 09/04/2005 7:04:41 AM PDT by joesnuffy (A bible that is falling apart, usually belongs to someone who isn't - Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Al Qaeda is no friend of Beijing. China has her own probels with Muslims in Xinjiang Province, and elsewhere along the Silk Road, all the way to Xian.

Khan had the know-how, if he wanted the funding for a Muslim bomb I doubt he'd go to North Korea. I'm thinking the $$$ trail leads far closer to the home of Al Qaeda itself, without the need for intrigue and conspiracies. Saudi Arabia, the real hub of the axis.


48 posted on 09/04/2005 7:41:22 AM PDT by cambridge (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Bump for later read.


49 posted on 09/04/2005 7:57:12 AM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Thanks for the ping!


50 posted on 09/04/2005 8:23:28 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Correct, but a pro football game on a Sunday night might get 9/11 publicity. Particularly if there are simultaneous disasters in 7 cities.


51 posted on 09/04/2005 8:48:48 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hess28
Good questions. They ARE a little hamstrung by the Church Amendments--are you old enough to remember that debacle? Wow, what a mess. But your questions still remain unanswered.

Two points, unrelated and perhaps not germane. First, I hear--posted on FR, I think--that we have several or many heroes in the military and CIA whom we will never hear of. They have died in this country and off our Eastern Coast, barely making it in time to stop detonations.

Second, right now, I am so depressed with the N.O. thing--right, it was local and state debacles, but it was also federal debacle, except for the Coast Guard--that I have no confidence in any government agency except the military. Fair warning: I have not had confidence in any government agency except the military in a long, long time.

52 posted on 09/04/2005 8:55:34 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

The key here is that Bin Laden wouldn't just attack one city, it would be a huge multi-faceted attack. We have seen this time and time again and this would be no differant. 7 cities at once with even small yield nukes would send the US into a spiral of chaos that would make Katrina look like a picnic.


53 posted on 09/04/2005 11:39:55 AM PDT by BootsOfEscaping
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Correct, but a pro football game on a Sunday night might get 9/11 publicity.

True, but he'd only get to do that once before U.S. defenses were fully galvanized and mobilized, so I think he probably decided that the next step had to go up to the level of violence necessary to give him his shot at a U.S. capitulation, or at least to score a clear strategic defeat of the United States. Defeating the United States would, in what I suspect is his thinking, reverse the tide of European and Christian defeat of Islamic expansion that began to run after the battles of Lepanto and Vienna 500 years ago.

After Osama's prospective victory over the U.S., his successors could begin to think again about expanding the world of Islam to swallow Europe, and he could realistically challenge the House of Saud for the protectorship of the shrine cities of Mecca and Medina -- and lay the foundations for eventually driving the Jewish state into the sea and recovering control of Jerusalem.

54 posted on 09/04/2005 1:08:04 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jammer
Fair warning: I have not had confidence in any government agency except the military in a long, long time.

Which is, from Osama's POV, quod erat demonstrandum. His way = right, and our principles = wrong.

Cheer up, we'll kill the SOB eventually. Nothing stinks worse in the nostrils of Islam than a dead false prophet.

55 posted on 09/04/2005 1:14:28 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
lol at your last line. Both your posts are good and well-taken. However, I don't believe, even from his POV, quod erat demonstrandum applies to our principles. It applies to our practice. A little more attention to our Bill of Rights (what they actually say)would at least succor me. Nothing will succor him except kill or be killed.
56 posted on 09/04/2005 3:38:19 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Paul L. Williams is a former consultant to the FBI on organized crime and terrorism.

FBI: "When we want your opinion, we'll ask for it"

57 posted on 09/04/2005 4:52:50 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Seriousness lends force to bad arguments. - P J O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
"Such information can be obtained by any journalist with a telephone, a computer, and a library card."

What do you guys think about the credibility of this? This interview sounds believable to me. Nuking America is the only way that OBL could achieve his objectives. How else could he kill 4 million?

We know that AQ had ties to Khan and sought to obtain nukes. This is getting scary. It isn't unthinkable that they could have smuggled nukes into the US, as Bush and others have in fact warned.

Is this guy just a crazy trying to sell books, or should we really be paying attention?

Should I get out the heavy duty foil or what?
58 posted on 09/04/2005 8:45:34 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I got my potassium iodide, and other supplies useful in such an attack, at KI4U, Inc.
59 posted on 09/05/2005 1:06:20 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: garjog
I think, just by tracing the Moscow Cesium 137 story that he mentioned, that he's a little prone to overstatement. I'll give you an example.

The Chechens left a Cesium137 cannister buried in a park, and then tipped off the media that it was there. This was done to demonstrate their capability, to get Moscow's attention that they were serious.

This author: In 1995, the Chechens under Com. Shamail Basayev planted a radiological bomb in Izmailovsky Park near Moscow . The bomb was made of cesium-137, and, if detonated, would have killed thousands of Russians. This incident represented the first case of a nuke to be deployed as a weapon of terror.

I found no evidence that there was a detonation mechanism. (There may have been, but my quick fact check didn't find one.) What I found was that it was just a component from a medical machine of some kind- cancer therapy perhaps?

So, yes, you too can be a researcher!! < /game show announcer> We all can, and in fact there are some really good ones on FR- much better than me. We ping each other from time to time to stuff like this.

So, for the most part, I think this is pretty believable. You can also trace the quotes from Kerry, Bush, Cheney, Goss, and many others who are aware of the possibility of this happening. Those are real quotes.

60 posted on 09/05/2005 5:21:30 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The more I find out about looters, the more I like my firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson