Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
We really need to rethink these no-pets policies for emergency shelters.

Why? Because people are sad? Look, their entire LIVES got turned upside down. Of course they're sad. But it doesn't change the fact that these shelters are designed for people, and the limited resources they have to sustain themselves need to be devoted to them and them alone.

but only people who got there by unofficial means got to take their pets.

Translate: only people who paid attention to the evacuation warnings got to take their pets.

It must have been doubly heart-breaking for those who were forced to leave pets behind, to arrive in Houston and discover that they would have been welcome there.

I'm sure it would be. Category 4/5 hurricanes are a real pain in the butt, aren't they?

4 posted on 09/03/2005 10:02:10 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mcg1969

One reason that people don't evacuate for a storm is because they can't take their pets with them. For every animal a person has, there is a 50% less likelihood of them evacuating. Most people don't see their dogs or cats as material posessions and even an emergency won't change that. It doesn't take much to accomodate pets if they are in crates and the owners look after them. Most counties in FL are starting to have pet friendly shelters because of this.


39 posted on 09/03/2005 10:54:17 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson