Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antaresequity

Nagin was much "calmer" after he talked with the President.

Sounds like he got his behind chewed and is now behaving much better.

Meanwhile, it looks like the feds took over anyway, they brought in active duty military and started airlifting the people out on military choppers. Maybe it isn't quite "legal", and the administration wanted to make it more legal by getting the governor to sign.

But the governor wouldn't sign? Because she was afraid it would be used to blame her?

I think what it MEANS is that the governor realised that if she signed something turning it over to the feds, it would be an admission by her that she couldn't do her job. NOT that the administration would then blame them.

The headline writer took her spin on this and made it into the headline. They like to do that.

I used to care, now I don't. I figure it gets a few liberals to READ the articles, and maybe they get to the paragraph where their hopes are dashed.


66 posted on 09/03/2005 8:27:51 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

"I used to care, now I don't. I figure it gets a few liberals to READ the articles, and maybe they get to the paragraph where their hopes are dashed."


First time I have laughed in a few days!


111 posted on 09/03/2005 8:53:56 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Meanwhile, it looks like the feds took over anyway, they brought in active duty military and started airlifting the people out on military choppers. Maybe it isn't quite "legal", and the administration wanted to make it more legal by getting the governor to sign. But the governor wouldn't sign? Because she was afraid it would be used to blame her? I think what it MEANS is that the governor realised that if she signed something turning it over to the feds, it would be an admission by her that she couldn't do her job. NOT that the administration would then blame them.

So, IF Bush is not legally covered, he is still safe because IF she tries impeachment on his, all of her incompetency will be revealed in detail. Therefore, she won't do anything. Yet, we know Hillary will use it.

178 posted on 09/03/2005 10:40:58 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Life is a God-given inalienable right to all Americans - not just the chosen ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson