Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Theoretically, you can lift water about 14 feet. In reality, you can lift it about 10 feet. Efficiency drops as draft increases. Tolerances have to be tighter also.
219 posted on 09/03/2005 8:26:16 PM PDT by Clay Moore ("My daddy says I'm this close to living in the yard!" Ralph Wiggum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Clay Moore
Theoretically, you can lift water about 14 feet. In reality, you can lift it about 10 feet. Efficiency drops as draft increases. Tolerances have to be tighter also.

So, you build a series of pumps lifting to higher and higher levels. As others have pointed out, though, it's not the pumps themselves which stop working when flooded; it's their power source that has stopped working thanks to flooding. Their electrical generators are flooded, and it is these which could have been located above the flood zone. The pumps could have continued to work - or anyway could have been built to have worked - while submerged, if planners had considered the problem.

223 posted on 09/03/2005 8:32:58 PM PDT by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: Clay Moore; Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Theoretically, you can lift water about 14 feet. In reality, you can lift it about 10 feet. Efficiency drops as draft increases. Tolerances have to be tighter also.

Yeah. If the pumps were located above sea level, then you'd still need other massive pumps below the water level just to prime the higher pumps. That's not a very sensible way to build plumbing.

294 posted on 09/04/2005 6:26:52 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson