Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare
When not activated for war, the governor acts as the commander of troops in his or her state.

or national emergency.

He could have formally declared one.

90 posted on 09/03/2005 10:43:11 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative

GOVERNOR of LA is a she.
She did not do ANYTHING until the President told people to get out.

WHAT is so hard to understand about this?

My unit was activated at the STATE level for a blizzard back in 97-98.
Though we were all technically activated, only four of us were put to use.
But it was a STATE level activation due to the blizzard.
Fast forward to 9/11.
In response to that, at the STATE level, members of my unit were activated.

Are you seeing a pattern here yet?
The responsibility to activate troops was not on the President, it was on BLANCO and she did NOTHING.


120 posted on 09/03/2005 11:18:53 AM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative

I re-read your post, and as follows:

"When not activated for war, the governor acts as the commander of troops in his or her state. " -Me
NOTE, I said GOVERNOR.

"He could have formally declared one." -you.

NOTE, subject is GOVERNOR.
Governor is a 'she'.
What is unclear to you?


162 posted on 09/03/2005 11:50:03 AM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson