Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CondorFlight
I'm afraid inertia (or worse) on the part of the big oil companies will stymie the effort.
____________________________________________________


lack of profit will stymie the effort. If there's no money in it who will bid? Gov't isn't answer. $4 gal gas prices are.
26 posted on 09/03/2005 7:27:05 AM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: photodawg
$4 gal gas prices are.

I think $2.50 would do it. The problem with this technology is it costs $35/bbl, while the middle east can produce for $4 (yes, they ARE raping us right now). I'm sure Shell's reluctant to pursue this because they could be drowned in Saudi oil at cheap prices at any time.

We need to find a way to stabilize prices and supply, then drain middle east oil until it's scarce enough that it costs them $35/bbl.

I'd go for invading the middle east, taking their oil, and putting their population on food stamps and required birth control. If the left is going to accuse us of such a thing, we may as well really do it.

31 posted on 09/03/2005 7:35:23 AM PDT by narby (Democrats are incompetent - just look at New Orleans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: photodawg

Shell is a big oil company....it doesn't look like it wants to stymie this process. I do find it interesting how-ever that Shell is "floating" this proposal in the MSM just as oil prices are reaching a huge high....you don't suppose there's anything disingenuous about this now do you?


92 posted on 09/03/2005 12:12:22 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (Even when a dog discovers he is barking up a wrong tree, he can still take a leak on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson