>>Oh, got you, we go down through Cary's laundry list, and all of the ones that don't concern fiscal policy won't matter.
Most all on the list deal with fiscal issues or have fiscal implications. To me, TAXPAYER FUNDING of stem-cell research, that Arnold endorsed, is a FISCAL issue. But seeing your tactics, you would probably like to paint anyone who opposed it as a terrorist blowing up abortion clinics.
Carry_Okie's list:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1474325/posts?page=107#107
So, RS, you are now free to cross check the numbers in the table.
"To me, TAXPAYER FUNDING of stem-cell research, that Arnold endorsed, is a FISCAL issue."
Y'know, I'm not too happy about that one either, for the same reason ( goes against some of my libertarian tendancies )
... the only way to rationalize it is that medical research is a clean, brain-power intensive industry, the kind of thing that we need more of in CA.
If we don't grab onto it when it is in it's infancy, we won't get a second chance. It could very well spark the next Silicon Valley, and we don't want it to be in Calcutta.
He's a good businessman, and knows you sometimes have to prime the pump.