[Enchante]

"SHAFFER: Same thing [in Afghanistan.] It took time to go through these points. The bottomline was, and the way I phrased it was, “We found two of the three cells which conducted 9/11, to include Atta.” That’s the way I phrased it to them. I don’t know if they didn’t recognize the Atta part, but I did specifically mention two of the three cells which conducted 9/11, and at the end of that I threw in Atta. Because my focus, honestly, was that we found two of the three cells. That was to me the most important factor, rather than focusing on Atta, as an individual. And that was what I told them. ... As I recall, at the end of the meeting, there was silence. People were just silent at what I’d said."

9/11 O-mission knew, at least Zelikoff.... Did he talk with Gorelicker when he got back from Afghanistan, did she turn the screws on him???

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks for ping. I am reading the GSN article. Looks like it is the best so far as how different entities fit into the over all scheme. Been wondering what best I can email or show some folks links to that does not confuse due to the large amount of stuff we have been able to gather. This article just might be a great starting point to share with people.

Thanks. No other comment, lots of digestion, burp, required at this point.

[pinz-n-needlez]

Thanks for the ping, Enchante. Now that I found a tank of gas for my car, we're going to be out for most of the weekend. I'll look forward to coming back and reading these articles carefully.

Have a nice weekend, everyone.

Pinz

[Freedom is eternally right]

I must have missed something in the GSN interview or maybe I need to reread it. IMHO, Lt. Col. Shaffer appears arrogant at best and at worse an extortionist. Notice how every name and/or meeting has another super duper secret program being discussed?

One thing I did get out of it was the answer to the question "Why is this coming out now?". It appears to me that Shaffer is just your better than average lobbyist. Seems to have more to do with a $50 million dollar appropriation than with information AD found, (other than perhaps his ego being hurt that he didn't get mentioned in the Omission Commission report).

Hope I'm wrong about this, but any hope for meaningful hearings on the Omission Commission just went to nil. Just so I don't put a damper on things, in Business Law classes I always got the ROL and reasoning right, almost always got the verdict wrong.

Flame away.