1 posted on
09/01/2005 8:10:35 PM PDT by
andie74
To: milagro; livius; steveegg
Not exactly what I had heard reported. Still interesting.
2 posted on
09/01/2005 8:12:27 PM PDT by
andie74
("No power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent." -- John Jay)
To: andie74
Responding to this Nonsense claim only validates it...like that idiot media whore Cindy...
No Response...other than: "People are dying right now and that is our first concern. Save your politics for another day...perhaps next week if you can contain yourself that long. Next Question Please"
To: andie74
It is soooo much fun watching politicians from Lousy-ana, whose greed and corruption finally bit 'em, and the LameStream chattering class idiot children, trying to second guess the engineers at the Army Corps of Engineeers.
When those who have never even lifted a shovel start criticising those who literally move mountains for a living I think "Bring out the popcorn, it's show time!"
The Liberals, and the rest of the "Communism Lite" crowd, will conveniently forget that they were all for "saving money" and thus only authorizing levees for catagory 3 hurricanes.
Real butter on that popcorn, please!
11 posted on
09/01/2005 8:20:50 PM PDT by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: Howlin; prairiebreeze; Mo1
I hope you all get a chance to read this.
12 posted on
09/01/2005 8:21:56 PM PDT by
Peach
(South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
To: andie74
Yea, but Bush still sucks.
To: andie74
The decision to build levees for a Category 3 hurricane was made decades ago based on a cost-benefit analysis.Well I guess now we've learned the hard way to do it right.
Rebuild it to withstand the worst case Category 5.
At least now that the adjacent property is probably already condemned,
there shouldn't be any difficulty acquiring it to both widen and heighten the levees.
To: andie74
Building for a Category 4 would have been overkill, huh? That's what disgusts me about cost-benefit analysis. Penny-pinching bureaucrats value the bottom line looking good over the cost in human lives. For me, the reverse is true. The value of a human life is absolute - and can never be quantified. You can't spend enough to save one person - let alone thousands.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
18 posted on
09/01/2005 8:32:19 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: andie74
There seem to be more and more Chicago Tribune links here that actually appear to be fair and balanced.
Am I right in that, or have these been anomalies?
20 posted on
09/01/2005 8:37:05 PM PDT by
lawnguy
(It works Napoleon, you don't even know.)
To: andie74
26 posted on
09/02/2005 6:29:07 AM PDT by
Uncle Donuts
(The sooner I can leave N. Va., the better.)
To: andie74
In recent years, funding has dropped precipitously, which some officials attributed in part to the escalating costs of the Iraq war. Funding for a drainage project in New Orleans went from $69 million in 2001 to $36.5 million in the current fiscal year, while funding for such hurricane-protection projects as levees around Lake Pontchartrain declined from $10 million in 2001 to $5.7 million this year, according to figures provided by the office of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.). Funding for these projects has generally trended downward since at least the last years of the Clinton administration. Congressional records show that the levee work on Lake Pontchartrain received $23 million in 1998 and $16 million in 1999. It was not clear how much the drainage project received in 1998, but records show it received $75 million in 1999.
All that money, and what's to show for it?
27 posted on
09/02/2005 8:06:34 AM PDT by
airborne
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson