Some of us prefer to keep science and religion separate.
By the way, the spell checker is our friend. That's three boo-boos in just one sentence.
I agree.Darwinism allows athiests to be intellectually fulfilled.Teaching darwinism is claiming we evolved from nothing unaided,thereby implying athiesm.Athiesm is a religion according to the 7th Circuit Court.
The Supreme Court has said a religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being.Torcaso v. Watkins.
I agree,seperation of church and state NOW.
Science and religion are not the issue. Science and God seem to be the issue - which are two different things. Whether God exists or not is entirely seperate from whether a system exists to deal with God. So the issue isn't religion. The issue is whether or not there is a God. And the evos and atheists in the scientific community would just rather not deal with the idea of a God they must answer to. They keep saying there is no way to prove God exists. Amazingly, though, everytime they go investigating deeper into the things that make everything tick, it points to a God. How clever. Must be really disappointing to live in a universe where the ultimate search for one's personal truth means denying the truth at any cost. Is that not the definition of delusion and uselessness.