Johnson pointed out one of the main flaws...you call it a discredited brain fart but unless you can rebut it, or defer to someone who has rebutted it, then your brain farting yourself.
I don't mind those who believe in darwinism, I think you can make good arguments for it, but I find it incredulous that so many darwinists believe there are no flaws at all in the theory. The fact is its a weak theory....maybe new evidence will strenthen it but it seems new evidence is doing just the opposite. So sorry.....
Which evidence is showing the opposite and how is it doing so? What about that new evidence is a refutation of which part of the theory of evolution.