Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl; PatrickHenry; All
What ever happened to the theory proposed by Teilhard de Chardin, a brilliant Jesuit paleontologist, which postulated that perhaps evolutionary processes were the tool God used to create life? Isn't that a form of "Intelligent Design?"

BTW, I personally believe in "Teach the Controversy." If I were a Biblical Creationist, why would I not want my kids to know there are people out there who may not believe what I want them to believe? Conversely, if I were an atheist and a strict evolutionist, shouldn't my kid know there are others out there, just as smart, who disagree?

This is getting a little nuts. After all, we are still in the "Theory" stage in most of human knowledge. We know evolution takes place. We don't know "how," we don't know "how much," and we sure as hell don't know "why."

146 posted on 09/01/2005 2:18:48 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (If the world were ruled by logic, men would ride sidesaddle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk
BTW, I personally believe in "Teach the Controversy." If I were a Biblical Creationist, why would I not want my kids to know there are people out there who may not believe what I want them to believe?

Because it turns science into a popularity contest. Unlike other disciplines, science has objective truths. A theory is correct or it isn't correct. Evolution is occuring whether we want it to or not, and that's what 100% of the available evidence shows. Our opinions on the subject are meaningless. Just teach the facts.

148 posted on 09/01/2005 2:26:41 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

BTW, I personally believe in "Teach the Controversy."

In a science class?

187 posted on 09/01/2005 4:23:23 PM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
BTW, I personally believe in "Teach the Controversy."

One way or anohter, that can be done very quickly.

One way:

"Some people don't like evolution and don't think it should be taught as science. These people aren't scientists."

Another:

"Some nonscientists want to teach the controversy. Scientists don't what to."

Student: "What controversy?"

"The controversy over teaching the controversy."

Student: "What controversy?"

"The controversy over teaching the controversy."

OK, the last one could potentially go on for a bit.
217 posted on 09/01/2005 4:57:37 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
Thank you so much for your post! I also have no problem with "teaching the controversy" - in any subject. I think it is good for the kids to know that there is still work to be done.

This is getting a little nuts. After all, we are still in the "Theory" stage in most of human knowledge. We know evolution takes place. We don't know "how," we don't know "how much," and we sure as hell don't know "why."

Indeed. Well said.

270 posted on 09/01/2005 8:24:21 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson