To: HiTech RedNeck
No, it has elements that are very socialistic.On the contrary! First-century believers adopted a communal lifestyle, but that wasn't at all socialistic, because it was strictly voluntary. Read Acts 5:1-5, noting particularly verse 4. "While you owned [the house], wasn't it your own? And after it was sold, wasn't the money still yours? So why lie about it?"
293 posted on
09/01/2005 8:03:43 AM PDT by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: Shalom Israel
You miss the context of the call by the Holy Spirit, the ultimate Government. God (gasp) WANTS Christians to have communal values. A & S were claiming that they had fulfilled the call that was upon them, when in fact they hadn't. The responsibility for what they had done with their property had been theirs; they could not pin the responsibility on anybody else. They didn't do with the property what God had wanted and yet (which was worse than the actual shortfall) claimed that they had. Go to a more literal translation for the facts.
313 posted on
09/01/2005 8:28:13 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson