No it wouldn't. Nothing about this tragedy is golden. I don't care if it's Bush's fault or Clinton's fault or Ted Kennedy's fault; there is no cause for rejoicing here. And I think politicizing this disaster -- by either side -- is both grossly premature and in extremely bad taste.
I'm not trying to politicize it, I think it's absolutely disgusting anyone is doing that. But I'm equally disgusted that the left is putting this blame on someone and I'd like to know the facts, that is why I am asking.
It is my understanding that what the Dems are blaming on Bush, the cuts, would not have taken the levees to a Cat 4 or Cat 5 level anyway. If, in fact, Hillary's own husband (let's not forget she is one of the ones blasting Bush on this) had that opportunity, well let's just say I think it would stop the political crap once and for all on this. Otherwise, it's going to continue.