Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

I would think it is reasonable to assume that when a major city is supposed to be completely evacuated, some military contingent needs to be mobilized at the same time to prevent looting.


3,723 posted on 09/01/2005 9:11:50 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3704 | View Replies ]


To: Jalapeno

Yep. Hindsight is 20-20. But obviously if you need to evacuate and entire city. While the people are leaving the Military needs to be arriving.


3,727 posted on 09/01/2005 9:13:05 AM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3723 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno

This is absolute chaos and is quickly becoming inexcusable IMO.


3,730 posted on 09/01/2005 9:13:38 AM PDT by conservativebabe (God Bless Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3723 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno
I would think it is reasonable to assume that when a major city is supposed to be completely evacuated, some military contingent needs to be mobilized at the same time to prevent looting.

True. But the issue is scope. Isolated looting is one thing, and that's probably what they were expecting. This sounds like (though it may not really be) something a lot bigger than "normal" looting.

At any rate, I think a bunch of disaster plans are going to be changed to account for the magnitude of looting in NO and other affected areas.

3,734 posted on 09/01/2005 9:15:44 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3723 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson