Geez Louise,, I get NO comment earlier when I ask you about little issues like the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, so what's the diff. aRnoids never seem to want to answer questions like that for some reason..lol
so I guess mentioning the supposed major drops in workers comp rates, etc, would go unanswered much less unmentioned by aRnoids like yourself too,, I wonder why? that seems like a plus if true..
--
why not try and make your own reality instead of buying into hype hype hype,, all that has gotten is a lot of lip service to reform reform reform and ended up with
ALL of us in deeper debt debt debt.
for some reason, we hear little about the debt, and even with somewhat significant reforms, there is no guarantee we will be any better off as the gub is a spending kind of guy anway, the last 2 budgets speak to that fact.
when you try and please everybody, you end up pleasing nobody.
Tom does not need aRnie to win as LT Gub unless he tries to undercut him, aRnie needs him and conservatives to show up the next 2 election cycles and more being as the Indies and dems that voted for aRnie are no lock anymore, in fact, many of them probably regret their votes that fateful day in 2003. which is really odd, they got almost everything they could have asked for anyway, if not from him, from the legislature.
btw,, will the gUb veto the Gay marriage bill when it hits his desk?
"Geez Louise,, I get NO comment earlier when I ask you about little issues like the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, so what's the diff."
Your "asking me" was in the form of a "still beat your wife" so it was obviously not worth replying to -
"Did you know aRnie was gonna stick it to the Sierra
Nevada property and busniess owners by signing the monstrosity called the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. Gray wasn't and I don't think Tom would."
Perhaps you would care to point out exactly what is in the bill you dont like, so I don't have to read your mind regarding what you are upset about ?
"...there is no guarantee we will be any better off as the gub is a spending kind of guy anway, the last 2 budgets speak to that fact."
As you may recall, during the election Arnold said if he could not get results throught the legislature, he would take it directly to the people - Tom is supporting ALL of Arnolds propositions.
"...aRnie needs him and conservatives to show up the next 2 election cycles and more being as the Indies and dems that voted for aRnie are no lock anymore, in fact, many of them probably regret their votes that fateful day in 2003.which is really odd..."
That's what it all boils down to, dosen't it ?
Is your dream world a Dem back in the big chair, and Tom having LESS influence again ?
Or perhaps you think Tom and his supporters should support Arnold and keep him there, so they might actually be listened to and work their way back into the process ?
"btw,, will the gUb veto the Gay marriage bill when it hits his desk?"
Are you taking bets ?
I've noticed you seem to put a lot of importance on what people say they will do, or what people think they will do, rather then what they do - does this go back to Toms ineffectiveness over many years in gUbment ?