Where to start? How about contradictions in a single post...
"Misleading, How? "
then
"When did you attack Tom? Oh geez, are you that clueless?"
Since I have not attacked Tom, unless of course you call pointing out the truth as "attacking", your statement IS misleading.
"Now you try and backpeddle and praise Tom, what a loser."
Not fair to attack Tom as a loser ( he did win a few elections )
"Your posts speak for themselves."
We agree again -
"I'm just dragging more of your inanities out for all to see."
You will have to point out where my statements are wrong if you want to do that - but you seem not to be able to accomplish that - petty insults get you nowhere, my friend ...
LOL.. Is that the best you can do.
You take some words and twist them to your flavor, how convenient.
You aren't attacking Tom and the Bots when you claim aRnie is better equipped to get the job done. Is that all politics is about these days,
All Q factors and no experience not required?
You fault Tom for never getting anything done, but you would vote for him as Gub. LOL
---
"Now you try and backpeddle and praise Tom, what a loser."
Not fair to attack Tom as a loser ( he did win a few elections )
---
Now if that isnt a stretch and a half, I don't know what one is.. LOL. I was calling you a loser, not Tom. and that isn;t an attack. just calling it the way I see it after this little exchange today.
You can not play both sides of the aisle and claim to be a conservative when you don't vote for and support conservatism.
--
Insults.. lol
Tomacazies.. ;-)
Your profile page needs a Barf
Alert when I read this..
--
Why are you here ? - Hope to find something you can use against my logic ?
Fool- deal with the subject and rethink your arguments instead of attempting a personal attack
Impressed ?
---
ROTF,, splitting my sides in laughter..
Thanks for the
Bumps