"I guess then that you suppor all of what is in this list."
I take it you also wrongly guessed that McClintock had a chance of winning ?
That's part of the problem with fanatics - they HAVE to find a slot to put people in, even if they have to assume or make up things.
Let me ask yuu the same simple question, noone seems to have the courage to answer -
Using 20/20 hindsight, would you prefer that Davis had not been recalled, or Bustamente had been elected over Arnold ?
So, you admit voting for a closet Democrat in order to "win"?
What did you win? What benefit was there? If it was just to beat Bustamante, you blew it, because McClintock would have beaten Bustamante anyway, one to one.
That's part of the problem with fanatics - they HAVE to find a slot to put people in, even if they have to assume or make up things.
You call conservatives "fanatics" and then accuse us of putting you in a slot?
Using 20/20 hindsight, would you prefer that Davis had not been recalled, or Bustamente had been elected over Arnold ?
I would prefer that we had three years of a wounded Davis fighting opposition tooth an nail and taking the Democrats in the legislature down with him to eight years of Arnold with Republicans getting the credit for putting the State into bankruptcy. There was no chance of Bustamante getting elected. That was a strawman on the part of Republican corporate socialists, of which you quite apparently approve.