Posted on 08/31/2005 2:03:20 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
"I have asked a number of questions, direct questions, and all you do is offer this back..
Well lets just see-
Question #1 - (post 31)
"Did you know aRnie was gonna stick it to the Sierra
Nevada property and busniess owners by signing the monstrosity called the Sierra Nevada Conservancy."
A "still beat your wife" question - assues that it IS a "monstrosity" but in any case "Did I know ?" makes no sense as the bill was not brought up before the election, therefore noone COULD know.
Question #2 ( Post 35)
"So I have no right to support who I choose to because it might make your guy have to work harder or actually take stances on important issues at debates, much less, even show up for debates... "
Answered directly in my post 36
Question #3,4,5,6,7,8 ( Post 36)
"You're a one man smear campaign today, huh? "
"Where's all your cohorts in jamming it to conservatives and conservatism."
"I guess Pete Wilson was and is still right, "Tom is irrelevant" , huh? "
"And how does Pete's wife keep getting 6 figure salary positions in state government."
"So who will he appoint to the Supreme Court, Moonbeam?"
"That must irk you and aRnie's supporters to no end, huh?"
Did you actaully expect answers to these - I may have wrongly assumed that it was simply a mindless rant ...
Question 9 ( post 39)
"Misleading, How? "
answered in my post 40
Question 10 ( Post 43 )
"Is that all politics is about these days,
All Q factors and no experience not required? "
Answered in post 46
Question 11,12 ( post 53 )
"so I guess mentioning the supposed major drops in workers comp rates, etc, would go unanswered much less unmentioned by aRnoids like yourself too,, I wonder why?
What's the question here ? Am I to adress why you wonder why?
"btw,, will the gUb veto the Gay marriage bill when it hits his desk?"
Gee, I'll ask him the next time I talk to him - If your question had been " Do you think ...?" I would have answered Yes, I THINK he will veto it. You may not like it, but it is the correct answer.
"PS I voted for the Recall and trusted that folks would not jump on a Trojan Horse's back and sadly was disappointed as a result, upwards of 20 plus billion dollars of new debt worth."
Using the gift of 20/20 hindsight - would you have voted against the recall ?
Do you really want an answer to that? lolo
Try this on.
I know of many who would vote differently knowing that the path chosen, while of least resistance seemed the way to go, now see their children saddled with additional debt in the futue and no change in the way business is being conducted in many areas.
Reform the people initiated is now no more certain than before. That the reform movement has been 'hijacked' and that includes the initiative process itself, is subject to debate and with good cause, imo.
Is that the current Gub's fault, not completely,but he is not without blame for letting the dem's off the hook when he first took office and offered to borrow like never before.
Gee, besides , if the state had bellied up, where would all the illegals get their benefits from then., AZ or NM? Huh?
Ahhh... so you're ready to address C.O.'s list now? LOL
Ben Franklin says that the sting of criticism is the truth of it.
"I know of many who would vote differently knowing that the path chosen..."
So, just what way would they have voted differently ? To leave Davis in charge or to put Bustamante in as the replacement ?
"Gee, besides , if the state had bellied up, where would all the illegals get their benefits from then., AZ or NM? Huh?"
Is that a legitiamte question that you actually expect an answer to ?
"Do you really want an answer to that? lolo "
Yes - the question was
Using the gift of 20/20 hindsight - would you have voted against the recall ?
... and I would really request an answer to it.
Shhh,, Im working on Recalling the Gub if this goes down.. lol
Governor: Tax Hike Possible if Prop. 76 Fails (Schwarzenegger) ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1475943/posts
PS .. You really request an answer to (would you have voted against the recall ? ) lol
Why? You wont be able sleep other wise? Too bad. :)
"Why? You wont be able sleep other wise? Too bad. :)"
Talk about having the courage of your convictions...
I think its time for you to try a new tagline - your current one dosen't seem to fit anymore.
Like you're much of a judge of anything.
you voted for aRnold Buffett Bilderberger, and have the audacity to accuse me of not having the courage of my convictions..lol
I bet ya just want to update the spreadsheet on me, huh?
There are some folks like that on this forum, yaknow.
ROFL!
"I bet ya just want to update the spreadsheet on me, huh? "
I suppose if the entry would say something that you feel comfortable saying you would have no problem with it -
... and it's kind of weak when on an anonymous board under an assumed name you can't even bring yourself to stand behind and vocalize your decisions.
"you voted for aRnold Buffett Bilderberger, and have the audacity to accuse me of not having the courage of my convictions"
Yep , and I would do it again today, with 20/20 hindsight - he was and is the only viable choice.
I stand by my decisions and convictions.
I believe that can be accepted as one of the meanings of Semper Fi, isn't it ?
LOL
I love it when hacks such as yourself milk anonymity as well.
You won't answer any of my questions but ya keep coming back insinuating things thru yours, you're reaching but that's not a surprise to most of us who understood what was at stake when the Recall went down.
"You won't answer any of my questions ..."
LOL - Did you somehow miss my recap of your questions on Post 61 ? Just which ones were you confused about ?
A "still beat your wife" question - assues that it IS a "monstrosity" but in any case "Did I know ?" makes no sense as the bill was not brought up before the election, therefore noone COULD know.
All you had to do was read his platform and environmental policy, which he published before the election and posted on his website. Or, you could have just read the analysis of all the nasty stuff he wanted to implement. All of this was available before the recall vote.
"Or, you could have just read the analysis of all the nasty stuff he wanted to implement. "
Your link ends with the statement -
"Nothing like a developer looking to cash in on farmland"
yet NormsRevenge posts here seem to say he is against development
"Did you know aRnie was gonna stick it to the Sierra
Nevada property and busniess owners by signing the monstrosity ..."
So if you don't mind, I'll just step aside and let you two guys work it out between you.
It's a matter of selecting the "right" developers in particular locations (per The Wildlands Project), sic:
Eli Broad is high on that list.
So if you don't mind, I'll just step aside and let you two guys work it out between you.
Despite your denials, you were warned.
Like I said, there are a number of threads that deal with the Sierra Nevada Conservancy and its long term implementation and implications for business and property owners in general now under its control.
I don't know that I can spotlight a single thread that sums it up, calcowgirl may be able to,, but if ya want some background, go spend sometime checking them out. (that oughta keep ya busy for a bit) :)
Looking down thread... Looks like he wasn't anymore obnoxious than at least one other little irritant!!!
"Despite your denials, you were warned."
Warned of what ? You seem to think I have a problem with his actions. I don't, so these so-called warnings mean nothing.
For example, IF he is able to follow through on his objective to promote the use of Hydrogen cars - someone will make a lot of money from it - or else it will not be done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.