Replies

Well, let's see. You've been a member of FR since Apr. 2004. You've made only 4 posts (including your reply to me.) In two of the 4 posts you have:
1. Implied we should be thankful to that thug Hugo Chavez
2. Implied that Pat Robertson being a Bush supporter is somehow relevant
3. Suggested that the MSM is trying to help Bush

Looks like you might be a sleeper ZOT to me.

i never implied that we should thank chavez. go back and read what i wrote. i simply said that those who reflexively crucify the "usual suspects" should see that sometimes the usual suspects arent the bogeymen that some would have us believe.

i do think its relevant, and i think that a man of god calling for an assassination isnt right.

i suggested no such thing. the usual cries of "its the media! its the media!" just dont apply when a quick search of the internet shows stories of hostage taking situations, riots for food, death everywhere, and i dont really hear anyone (fox, cnn or msnbc) saying that bush is in any way responsible. i just dont think it rings true at this point.

all in all, sorry i dont agree with the usual ad hominem responses.