[nicmarlo]

The point is, GWB, you were rejecting out of hand, MFH's post, simply because the lame stream media wasn't reporting what he posted.

That you would even rely upon the lame stream media to print the truth is also laughable.

Does Dan Rather/cBS come to mind? How about "Bias"
They don't report the truth anymore....unless it serves a purpose...the press are presstitutes....I don't rely upon them for news...I only "use" them as confirmation to what is reported now, mostly through other means, i.e., FR/Bloggers, etc.

[papertyger]

I don't rely upon them for news...I only "use" them as confirmation to what is reported now, mostly through other means, i.e., FR/Bloggers, etc.

Hell, I don't listen to them either, and I R married to one ;o>

[George W. Bush]

That you would even rely upon the lame stream media to print the truth is also laughable. Does Dan Rather/cBS come to mind? How about "Bias" They don't report the truth anymore....unless it serves a purpose...the press are presstitutes...

One involves their political motivations (Rather). The other is a natural disaster which the Left (global warming nuts and critics of Republican management of government) will seek to capitalize on.

In both they have motive. But one was entirely fabricated and peddled as propaganda. But with this disaster, despite their motives for massively over-reporting casualties, they seem pretty cautious.

I think you refuted your own points. But that's just me.