To: JennysCool
Now you're just being stupidly obtuse. You know the post doesn't infer any of that. And carping about semantics is just childish.
I'd love to see the IP logs for FR. You're strangely defensive here for a mere hearsay story with no corroborating accounts anywhere in the media-mad world.
Isn't it strange that no pictures of these thousands of dead in the trees and on the beaches from cell phone cameras have surfaced yet? At least, I find it strange. Admittedly, this isn't like camera-happy California but, contrary to public image, the South isn't actually backwards technologically.
To: George W. Bush
cell phone cameras You think there would be cell phones left on the beaches?
1,269 posted on
08/31/2005 7:54:56 AM PDT by
JennysCool
(Non-Y2K-Compliant)
To: George W. Bush
Isn't it strange that no pictures of these thousands of dead in the trees and on the beaches from cell phone cameras have surfaced yet? I haven't seen pictures of ANY bodies yet. I guess that means nobody died at all?
1,273 posted on
08/31/2005 7:55:46 AM PDT by
Sloth
(Archaeologists test for intelligent design all the time.)
To: George W. Bush
Admittedly, this isn't like camera-happy California but, contrary to public image, the South isn't actually backwards technologically. A few weeks ago my California based cell phone and I went hundreds of miles without any antenna bars in southern MO/northern AR. (Incompatible local coverage)...
1,280 posted on
08/31/2005 7:58:10 AM PDT by
null and void
(It's all like watching a train wreck, in slow motion, from the front of the train.)
To: George W. Bush
Isn't it strange that no pictures of these thousands of dead in the trees and on the beaches from cell phone cameras have surfaced yet?That's the firrst I've heard of cell phone cameras causing the deaths of thousands in trees and on beaches. You got a legitimate source for this info?????
To: George W. Bush
"You're strangely defensive here for a mere hearsay story with no corroborating accounts anywhere in the media-mad world. Isn't it strange that no pictures of these thousands of dead in the trees and on the beaches from cell phone cameras have surfaced yet? At least, I find it strange."
The media are more cautious than you think. They like to get death statistics from official sources, and official sources are typically conservative in announcing deaths. They would rather underreport than overreport in the initial phases of a tragedy.
Members of the media are not, to my knowledge, poring through debris and wreckage looking for bodies. Moreover, they are not likely to show pics of dead bodies in a non-war setting, paricularly when communications are down and families are separated. But the media HAVE reported many bodies - without showing them - and have mentioned that the emphasis is still on rescue rather than accounting for the dead. I personally think 3,000 or more deaths is quite likely.
To: George W. Bush
It was a metaphor. An Astonishing exclusive BREAKING NEWS article about a rumor of lots of bodies is obviously not intended to be a literal snapshot of reality
1,301 posted on
08/31/2005 8:07:48 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson