Sure it can. VadeRetro occasionally publishes a fossil skull series on these threads showing tiny, gradual changes between our ape-like ancestors and modern man.
Anyway, why do you want to waste your time arguing with me? You won't change my mind and I wouldn't pretend to even try to change yours. We just disagree.
I don't do it for you. I do it for the lurkers. I want them to see who has the evidence on his side and who has the tired canards. All us evos are like that. That's while you see references in many of our posts; we don't expect you to follow up on them (Morton's Demon doesn't like that), but we figure others following the exchange might.
Tiny changes in skulls - yeah, that explains it. LOL Keep living in your Darwin fantasy world.
Hey Junior, don't worry, be happy.
If 9852 is his Birthday the he has spent over 50 years wallowing in ingorance. He doesn't want you bursting his bubble.
The compact version is linked in-line to the article, but there's also a large-format one for people who have trouble seeing intermediate forms.
You'd think it would make an impression upon the "Lucy was a chimpanzee" people, but it doesn't. (Actually, Lucy does look rather like a chimpanzee in the skull. But she was a very upright-walking "chimpanzee.")