Why should the former necessitate the latter?
If abiogensis, and hence macro-Evolution are true, there is no God.
Why should the former necessitate the latter?
If *god* could not get it correct the first time, and required millions of years and countless cycles of death to create, why would anyone want to serve that *god*? he/she is not much of a *god*, really nothing more than blind chance!
Evolution and God are mutually exclusive. To mix them is intellectually dishonest to the premise of either, and an anathema to both. Darwin wrote to refute the creation account. Genesis was written to explain how Jesus did it in 6 days! Only one can be correct. Read Genesis for the creation sequence. It has Earth first, then light, then sun (stars were after sun & moon!). Water first, then earth. Water and Fowl first, then land animal.
If Genesis got it wrong, the whole Bible is in question and invalid, for it claims to be The Word of God, perfect, ineerant, and everlasting. Either the Bible is perfect, or man's ability to sit in judgement of it is perfect.