Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
An FR thread I just found:

Gorelick addressed her 1995 memo to several different people:

* Mary Jo White, US District Attorney, prosecuting the 1993 WTC bombing terrorists

* Louis Freeh, FBI Director

* Jo Ann Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division (DoJ)

* Richard Scruggs, Chief Counsel, Office of Intelligence Policy and Review

This last addressee makes the connection to the Department of Defense that the Gorelick defenders claim didn't exist. As Tate points out and as the OIPR website makes clear, the DoD looked to the OIPR for legal opinions on anything having to do with the legality of their operations, especially in regard to those involving domestic targets:

The Office of Intelligence Policy and Review, under the direction of the Counsel for Intelligence Policy, is responsible for advising the Attorney General on all matters relating to the national security activities of the United States. The Office prepares and files all applications for electronic surveillance and physical search under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, assists Government agencies by providing legal advice on matters of national security law and policy, and represents the Department of Justice on variety of interagency committees such as the National Counterintelligence Policy Board. The Office also comments on and coordinates other agencies' views regarding proposed legislation affecting intelligence matters.

The Office serves as adviser to the Attorney General and various client agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Defense and State Departments, concerning questions of law, regulation, and guidelines as well as the legality of domestic and overseas intelligence operations.

The inclusion of Richard Scruggs, the lead counsel at the OIPR, intended to send the message that any advice given to the DoD, CIA, and State regarding the sharing of files had better fall in line with her new stated policy of going "beyond the law" to avoid any appearance of impropriety. Given that Gorelick held a high-profile position within Justice as a political appointee of Bill Clinton, this policy would rightly get attention as an official directive of the President's wishes. The one office that all of these intelligence agencies would consult in terms of sharing and coordination between themselves and law-enforcement operations would therefore have advised all agencies to follow the Gorelick Wall as a standard and as White House policy.

Given that kind of connection, it doesn't take much imagination to understand why all of these agencies became shy about even attempting to stretch the limits of the Gorelick policy.

The notion that Gorelick's memo had no effect outside the DoJ does not stand up to scrutiny at all, once the fact and intent of including Scruggs and the OIPR become known. This shows why Mary Jo White objected so strenuously to this memo and its implementation, and why she went out of her way to antagonize her bosses at the DoJ with a second and more heated memo predicting, correctly, that such a policy would leave America unprotected against the very people she had just successfully prosecuted.

The Gorelick Wall Encompassed Defense, CIA, And State

738 posted on 08/30/2005 7:06:40 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]


To: ravingnutter

Excellent background information! Thank you oh so very much!


742 posted on 08/30/2005 7:37:22 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter

Good research! This story is screaming to get out.... And I am too.


746 posted on 08/30/2005 7:40:58 AM PDT by right wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter; Alamo-Girl
Hmmm ... Gorelick sent her 1995 "Wall" memo to Richard Scruggs, Chief Counsel, OIPR. The same Richard Scruggs no doubt who took over OIPR from Mary Lawton following her untimely death in 1993, and shortly thereafter created the Wall, if my Post #616 is accurate.
785 posted on 08/30/2005 9:26:43 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

To: ravingnutter

bttt


867 posted on 08/30/2005 3:10:34 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson