[YaYa123]

This latest is probably why over the week-end, the Pentagon spokesman changed his tune, and suddenly became less insulting to Shaeffer, Phillpot, and the third contractor, who's name I can't remember right now, and now Weldon tells us, there's one more. I sent a "Letter to the Editor" of Washington Times today about it:

To the Washington Times:
"Pentagon spokesman, Lawrence DiRita keeps changing his story on Able Danger. First he mocked the memory of LTC Shaefer, then the combined memories of Shaefer and Phillpot. Now that another Able Danger contractor has come forward, DiRita issued a statement over the weekend saying, there's no reason to doubt the combined memories of these three men.

Oh, DiRita continues to ask the Catch 22 question: "Where's the documents?" The Pentagon has to know if these three whistleblowers had documents, unlike Sandy Berger, they would be severely punished for stealing classified documents.

Why isn't DiRita's latest version of the Pentagon position covered in newspapers today? It should be, if only so Americans will understand it's not just the 9-11 Commission that practices situational truth-telling."

"Where's the document?" Now we know.

[Texas Songwriter]

Who in the chain of command could order the documents destroyed?.....Cohen, Clinton,....a general in charge. The army doesn't take orders from the likes of Gorelick. Who else?

[Lancey Howard]

Great letter! I hope the Washington Times publishes it.
And you are right - - I think the Pentagon (and others) are going to be forced to swallow hard and NOT ask, "Where's the records?"