I love Ann because her brain is like a roladex of information. If someone says A she counters not only with B, but about 10 bits of fact to validate it.
She is incredible. She doesn't just bite back, but there are fact based fangs in that mouth!
Agree completely. Ann's a pioneer.
There's `pre'-Ann Coulter: The Today show, the CBS Evening News, etc.--all taken seriously. And then there's `post'-Ann Coulter, where we are today. I'll take post.
Shrill? You may not recall that Katie & Co. treated her like an addled, misbehaving child. She was one of the first to tell smarmy Cronkite-types: "If I want any more *stuff* out of you, I'll unscrew your head." And then she did.
Ann is Phyllis Schlafly, 2005. She gets better every year.
(Gushing completed, capping successful.)
Well I'd have to disagree there. Sometimes Annie's facts are suspect to say the least, little things like Canada sent troops to Vietnam give the left a ton of ammo. (I realise Canadians did fight in Vietnam but the Canadian government did not send troops to fight)
She hides alot behind the (I'm not being serious) but then that lessens her arguments (and sometimes she does have some very good points)
I'm sure Ms Coulter won't lose much sleep over this one paper though if this is a trend......