Kill Saddam! U.S. journalists agree: If you can't beat him, assassinate him. (1997 of course)

Mother Jones.com ^ | 25 November 1997 | Eric Umansky

[GBA]

"Clinton got just as much, if not more flack from the press for all the stuff done in his presidency."

You're simply wrong. And any flack Clinton got, he more than deserved. Actually, he deserved MUCH more than he got and he still does.

9/11: The real Clinton legacy.

[Grampa Dave]

"I don't think that is true. Clinton got just as much, if not more flack from the press for all the stuff done in his presidency. It just seems like less, because it was from FR, instead of against FR."

Post the flack that Clintoon and these mediots got. Then we can compare them.

[Grampa Dave]

I don't know if there were any. If they failed, would we have been told.

Actually, threats like this by the Clintoons were probably extortion tools to get some of that "Oil for Food" money from Saddam.

[stuartcr]

I'd say it was about the same, but it's easy to forget stuff....when we want to.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks.

This will be going out on my conservative email list and my list to drive lefties into a deeper insanity.

[stuartcr]

No, just go back and do your own research...there's simply too much to look up.

[Grampa Dave]

"I'd say it was about the same, but it's easy to forget stuff....when we want to."

Research the flak and post it.

[Grampa Dave]

I'm not the one who brought up this diversion attempt. You did. Now back it up with data.

[VRWCmember]

Clinton got just as much, if not more flack from the press for all the stuff done in his presidency. It just seems like less, because it was from FR,

News flash for stuart! FR is not "the press". And just in case you don't remember -- the press might have well been clinton's public relations firm the way it carried water for him during his presidency.

[stuartcr]

As I just said, no, I don't have enough time. Just go over to a liberal forum and ask the same question, I'm sure someone there will be more than happy to accomodate you.

[frogjerk]

I'd say it was about the same, but it's easy to forget stuff....when we want to

And its easy to make contrary assertions without data to back up your claim when you want to.

[Grampa Dave]

Keep replying with your refusal to find data to back up your claim. You have time to reply but no time to back up your claim.

[stuartcr]

If you were to use the entire sentence when quoting, you would see what I was talking about....I did not say FR was the press.

[stuartcr]

This is quite amusing. I told a colleague of mine that this would be the response I would get, and that no one would remember, and everyone would demand back-up data. Thanks.

[Tulane]

Because, um, er, just because.

[Grampa Dave]

Poolie18's Toons Today has a copy of an article by one of these liberals re killing Saddam.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1472647/posts

[Grampa Dave]

John, good morning.

This might be worth 2 cents.

[Grampa Dave]

FYI and creative mind.

[EQAndyBuzz]

"Why was it OK to get rid of terrorists the easy way under Clintoon and forbidden under Bush?"

Because the MSM are DNC shills.

[Paleo Conservative]

Just like when Clinton ordered the execution of that retarded inmate when he ran for election

That inmate was not retarded because he had been so from birth, but because he had tried to commit suicide after the police had cornered him after he committed the murder that put him on death row. The bullet instead of killing him gave him a lobotomy.