Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
Perhaps you should ask Jesus of Nazareth, who could have saved His life but felt it would have been wrong.

Isn't Jesus a special case? Really, now.

Some things are more precious than life, including ideals. Is violating the Commandment "Thou Shalt Not Steal" lesser in precendence than saving a life?

Rights are useless without life. I believe the very definition of an "idealogue" is someone who believes his ideals and principles are more valuable than an actual human life expiring in front of him.

Maybe you would let someone die rather than "steal" medicine for them during an emergency, but I would not.

Just for hoots...what would you say if two people in the pharmacist's family died because those medicines used to save the other person were not available? Was it wrong then?

Well, in my scenario, the pharmacist and his family were not on the premises. We can discuss how to ration supplies during an emergency, but I think a basic element of any scheme would have to admit that people actually present have a higher claim on emergency medicines than those theorhetically in need at a future time who aren't even here. The life dying here right now takes precednce.

SD

3,991 posted on 08/29/2005 1:17:32 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3925 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; Gondring
"Maybe you would let someone die rather than "steal" medicine for them during an emergency, but I would not. "

Especially since it isn't necessary to "steal" the medicine at all. Leave an IOU. Pay for the stupid medicine later when the pharmacist has his business up and running again.
4,073 posted on 08/29/2005 1:34:59 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3991 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson