Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml1954
I repeat, Darwin did not theorize micro evolution and a macro evolution

Not sure what your point is. Macro evolution is being taught and is at the center of the debate. In fact it is the entire debate.

335 posted on 08/29/2005 5:59:24 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

Not sure what your point is. Macro evolution is being taught and is at the center of the debate. In fact it is the entire debate.

According to the TOE, the mechanisms that produce genetic diversity within a species are identical with those that produce genetic diversity between species.

To think that what causes genetic diversity within species stops generating genetic changes when it gets to changes that would cause a news species is not plausible.

To think that gamma rays or whatever causes genetic mutation selectively avoid causing genetic mutations that might result in speciation is illogical. How would a gamma ray know to make this change because it would only cause diversity within the species but not make that change because it might cause speciation. This is logically untenable.

Macro and micro evolution are just short hand labels used to categorize these resulting genetic changes. The mechanism of the change are the same.

It's been fun plain talk, but I'm going to go play golf now...a game almost certainly designed by an evil Intelligent Designer.

338 posted on 08/29/2005 6:18:08 AM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson