"If ID is scientific, it must work within the scientific method. My proposition ID is not scientific because there is no possible test exists to provide evidence of ID."
You strike me as the kind of guy who gets his talking points and sticks with them, come hell or high water. Trying to reason with you is a complete waste of time. You are incapable of objective thought. You are ignorant -- but you make up for it by being arrogant.
You strike me as the kind of guy who likes to dodge and weave. You avoid drilling down on any details. You are like the infintry squad that lays down a lot of fire but never advances on the target. You strike me as the kind of guy who would say he voted for something before he voted against it.
My question is not a talking point. It is one simple question that asks for one simple answer.
Provide the details of ONE experiment that can be used to verify the ID hypothesis.