Good.
That isn't my point. You are the one missing the mark. "Moron" and "knuckle dragger" shows the lack of manners, class, and ability to form a reasoned, mature argument.
Show me a post where I used those terms please. If you cannot then I expect an apology.
Science, by it's own definition, isn't capable of discussing a "Creator". That doesn't mean it isn't factual, or logical, or valid to believe in one.
I agree and have been stating this very thing on these threads for more than 4 years.
But I see no reason to degenerate into vile behavior in the defense of evolution because of that fact.
Pardon?
Also, Intelligent Design is not necessarily creationism. Connecting the two is not accurate. To persist in the connection is to lose all credibility.
Not true. ID by its very nature posits a creator of some kind, thusly it fall squarely in the creationist camp.
Point One: Read the post again in context. Therefore no apology is needed.
Point two: Read the posts I was responding to. That should explain the name calling.
Point three: No smokescreen or disinformation allowed. If s a scientist creates a living organism in a lab from scratch he is not God. Therefore the postulate that life on earth was engineered does not necessarily presuppose God as the designer. Thus it does not fall squarely in the creationist camp as they state the origin is biblical and God is the creator.