To: mewzilla
I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around the scale of this thing.
The scale, at least in my local perspective in Los Angeles, is a 7.9 or larger earthquake in the downtown metropolitan area with significant aftershocks. With a little bit of strengthening, a disaster on a similar scale is actually impossible in Los Angeles without going to nuclear weapons. Large nuclear weapons.
I'm praying that every forecaster is absolutely wrong, that this is completely wrong, and it will fizzle out. In any event, I'm now doubtful that Bush will be coming to visit the local area..
This is absolutely the worst thing that could happen... Oh, and as a side note, expect a jump in gas prices of a quarter in the next week and a half. I'm fillin' up my tank tomorrow.
953 posted on
08/28/2005 4:54:30 AM PDT by
kingu
(Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
To: kingu
Well, the disaster part I can get a handle on. We had Agnes up here in '72. We lived with the aftereffects of her visit for quite a while. It's physical aspect of the storm itself, the energy it generates, that I can't get a grasp of. How the thing does what it does. It's just horrifically awesome.
964 posted on
08/28/2005 4:58:22 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: kingu
Put simply, for New Orleans: This IS the worst case scenario.
967 posted on
08/28/2005 4:59:37 AM PDT by
cincinnati65
(Just up the road a piece.......)
To: kingu
I just don't have a grasp on what this is like being another southern CA dweller. I've been in tropical storms but no tornadoes or hurricanes.
971 posted on
08/28/2005 5:02:51 AM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson