Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dawn53
Two questions, for anyone, f I may. Am I correct in understanding that the absolute worse case scenario is if the eye passes just tot he West of NO, becuase the right/front quadrant of the storm is always the worse?..

Also, is this "heghtened" intensity of the R/F storm quadrant quantifiable? Is it, for example 10%, or 20% stronger in winds, rain?

1,792 posted on 08/28/2005 8:30:31 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

Yes, the NE quadrant is always the worst because that's where the winds are heading the direction of land, pushing a wall of water (surge).

But, the size of this thing in area and strength, I don't think N.O. is very safe either way.


1,821 posted on 08/28/2005 8:35:49 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1792 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Am I correct in understanding that the absolute worse case scenario is if the eye passes just tot he West of NO, becuase the right/front quadrant of the storm is always the worse?..

It doesn't matter at all with a storm of this magnitude. If it were a smaller storm, passing just to the east would be the worst, because the winds would shove the lake into the city from the north.

But in this case it just doesn't matter. The city is going to be uninhabitable for quite some time.

1,865 posted on 08/28/2005 8:42:51 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1792 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson