To: johnmecainrino
i could be wrong but what i heard was over 3000 pro bush and 100 or so anti-usa protestors
2 posted on
08/27/2005 3:18:15 PM PDT by
italianquaker
(CONFIRM THE JUDGES BUSH=MANDATE)
To: italianquaker
i left around 2:30 and yes... they were REALLY outnumbered
3 posted on
08/27/2005 3:20:06 PM PDT by
TxBec
(Tag! You're it!)
To: italianquaker
i could be wrong but what i heard was over 3000 pro bush and 100 or so anti-usa protestors According to the AFP that's about the same.
4 posted on
08/27/2005 3:20:36 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: italianquaker
i could be wrong but what i heard was over 3000 pro bush and 100 or so anti-usa protestors
I wonder if someone thought to hire a plane or helicopter to overfly the area and take pictures. It would be nice to have solid photographic evidence to throw in the other side's faces.
Although given that the President was in the area, I doubt an overflight would have been allowed even if it was thought of (maybe we can hope that the USSS has aerial photos?).
To: italianquaker
Saw very little of it on FOXNews... and what little I saw made no mention of numbers. FOX let us down bigtime.
8 posted on
08/27/2005 3:24:06 PM PDT by
johnny7
(“And now, little man, I give the watch to you.”)
To: italianquaker
9 posted on
08/27/2005 3:24:18 PM PDT by
Just Lori
(Trying to reason with a liberal is like sucking spaghetti through a straw.)
To: italianquaker
Or the more accurate (cough-cough) description: "Thousands of anti-war demonstrators and pro-troops supporters..." (it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is).
13 posted on
08/27/2005 3:28:06 PM PDT by
shezza
(God Bless Our Troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson