Skip to comments.
Amid GOP divide on immigration, White House moves toward new plan
AP ^
| 8/27/05
| RON FOURNIER
Posted on 08/27/2005 10:23:56 AM PDT by GOPGuide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: GOPGuide
..how many Republican Congressmen are willing to go down with Bush's collapsing poll numbers(?).. This has to be our point of attack. Bush himself seems completely impervious to preventing the literal destruction of the US in it's current form, and seems completely unaware of the potential magnitude of the political fallout.
The House of Representatives is a different story. If they think this is an issue that can defeat or elect a Congressman/woman, they will break from Bush in a heartbeat.
41
posted on
08/27/2005 10:46:44 AM PDT
by
MrNatural
("...You want the truth!?...")
To: moehoward
Has he read his own bill? It's every bit the knee-slapper. You bet it is. He doesn't think they will turn themselves in to be deported, but some how he thinks they will step forward and pay a 2K fine and back taxes??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Silly man. He's gotta go.
42
posted on
08/27/2005 10:46:56 AM PDT
by
planekT
(No fence, no vote.)
To: Happy2BMe
43
posted on
08/27/2005 10:46:56 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
To: GOPGuide
The White House may take the unusual step of writing the legislation or submitting specific language to Congress. The failed President of Mexico, Vicente Fox, will dictate the legislation, of course.
GWBush and those who came before him, with the help of traitors in Congress, have sold America out.
To: Uncle Vlad
The primary reason for the 2nd Amendment!
45
posted on
08/27/2005 10:47:37 AM PDT
by
Roccus
(I've been described as a cynical romantic. Also a romantic cynic.)
To: Uncle Vlad
"I'm afraid he was right."
No need to be afraid, I'm proud to see that so many people are willing to toss partisanship aside in favor of doing the right thing.
46
posted on
08/27/2005 10:47:37 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: GOPGuide
"From construction companies in Arizona to farmers in the Midwest and California, many industries need those cheap and available workers."
Problem is they are Illegal immigrants because they can be fired on the spot with no recourses. Americans need not apply.
My brother is a crew chief and will not hire Americans. Plenty apply but all for naught. If he hires them they want raises for good work, they want extra pay for jobs far away, but worse of all if he fires them they oft times sue.
With the Mexicans he just fires them when they stop working hard or injury themselves. Where as an American gets workers comp.
These are Jobs Americans would love to have but have no chance at. They paid over $20 / hour until they were all replaced with Illegals. Now they par $10 / hour.
Make these illegals legal and they will also demand more money, sue when fired and demand workers comp. At least Americans will then have a chance of getting a job and the wages will go up.
By the way even though wages are way down home cost way more. Only the big companies make more money off these illegals. The taxpayers and everyone else gets soaked.
47
posted on
08/27/2005 10:47:48 AM PDT
by
ImphClinton
(Four More Years Go Bush)
To: cripplecreek
The media attaches all things to the war in Iraq but personally I think the plummeting approval ratings are a combination of things. It is more than just Iraq. In January 2004 when Bush first proposed this lunacy his poll ratings sunk 10 points overnight. People are aware of this issue more than he and Congress think and will not forget so easily by 2006.
To: GOPGuide
Bush and his advisers are caught between their supporters in the business sector, who believe the economy needs those workers, ... These are not ordinary, legal 'workers', these are illegal aliens.
Make that sentence "Bush and his advisers are caught between their supporters in the business sector, who believe the economy needs these illegal workers, ..." to see how absurd this sounds. American businesses do not need to be breaking the law to hire these illegals, and the president should not be proposing ways for businesses to profit from their illegal activities.
The president, as the head of the executive, should be enforcing our immigration laws against those who are blatantly flouting them by sneaking across our borders and those who are encouraging them by hiring them (and those who are now trying to encourage them to buy homes with mortgage money that largely comes from the GSEs.)
i used to think Bush was laying a nice path for conservatives to the future. it's been looking a bit more rocky lately
he has a profound disconnect on immigration...really incredible....one day, if the existing American culture is not completely subjugated, academics will talk about this:
"he was great on foreign policy and strong when American needed it, he tried to institute some tax reforms and a wee bit of cultural conservatism and had some successes but he ignored illegal immigration back when there was still a chance to do something about it."
50
posted on
08/27/2005 10:48:36 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(dixie deadhead)
i used to think Bush was laying a nice path for conservatives to the future. it's been looking a bit more rocky lately
he has a profound disconnect on immigration...really incredible....one day, if the existing American culture is not completely subjugated, academics will talk about this:
"he was great on foreign policy and strong when American needed it, he tried to institute some tax reforms and a wee bit of cultural conservatism and had some successes but he ignored illegal immigration back when there was still a chance to do something about it."
51
posted on
08/27/2005 10:49:04 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(dixie deadhead)
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: GOPGuide
...White House moves toward new planDoes this mean they are admitting that whats been going on for the last five years was part of a plan?
53
posted on
08/27/2005 10:52:18 AM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: agitator
My question is how do we determine if an ilegal was here before or after 2-04?? What a joke.
"Si Senior I was hereo beforo 2owo 4 owo""
54
posted on
08/27/2005 10:53:12 AM PDT
by
superiorslots
(Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
To: prion
What wing of the Republican Party is pro illegal immigration?! I'd consider Jim Kolbe, Jeff Flake and Chris Cannon to be part of the cheap labor wing of the GOP.
To: GOPGuide
Struggling to pacify his party's warring wings, President Bush is moving toward allowing illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. before February 2004 to qualify for guest-worker visas. Funny, I don't feel pacified. I feel p!ssed-off.
We're being sold out and the only ones who are even bothering to attempt to address the issue are the frickin' Democrats for pity's sake!
If this crap keeps up, we may as well kiss the White House and the Congress goodbye in 2008.
56
posted on
08/27/2005 10:54:10 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: inquest
Quote: If the economy needs immigrant workers, then they can come here legally.
But then big business will have to pay workers comp, SS, etc
57
posted on
08/27/2005 10:55:04 AM PDT
by
superiorslots
(Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
To: prion
>>>>What wing of the Republican Party is pro illegal immigration?!The GOP-people oppose illegal immigration and amnesty.
It's the majority of GOP politicos who are pro-illegal immigration.
58
posted on
08/27/2005 10:55:13 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
To: prion
The US Senate and the NYT run this country, not the President.
And both of these orgs are elitists snobs who are drunk with power, and for 40 years have been firmly entrenched.
Since the Pres seems to sign every bill that comes out of the legislators, ie the peoples body, then it is up to us to pressure the Senate, and demand they ignore their puppet-masters in the press.
To: superiorslots
Wouldn't they have to do that anyway once the illegals are "legalized"?
60
posted on
08/27/2005 10:56:54 AM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson