Posted on 08/27/2005 8:18:20 AM PDT by bigbob
Our Word - Our Apology
It was a heart-rending story--a blonde waif, her mother dead, entrusted to the care of a family friend while her father fought with the 101st Airborne in Iraq. The youngster was intelligent, friendly and engaging, and developed close bonds with many of the newsroom staff. Then a week ago came the news that her father had been killed in Iraq.
Every war casualty leaves a trail of pain, but the story of a 10-year-old girl losing her only parent to the war is particularly poignant, and the Chicago Tribune showed interest.
In the course of checking out the details, a troubling problem appeared: The story wasn't true
(Excerpt) Read more at dailyegyptian.com ...
No doubt from The Jason Blair Chair.
Interviewing for the New York Times.

.
Huh?
What bothers me is the fact that dyed in the wool liberals will ignore the falsehoods and go on to spread the tragic news of the little girl only leaving out the minor fact that she didn't exist.
Why would you excerpt something from a student newspaper? Not only is it likely that the newspaper will flush it down the memory hole, but it's not likely that it will come after FR with a copyright complaint.
"These are the heirs to the fourth estate?"
Looks as if they're right on track with their
training and education, doesn't it?
Well, she finally got some at age 27.
and
should emmulate these kids.
Excellent point. Let's get the whole story here:
Our Word - Our Apology
It was a heart-rending story--a blonde waif, her mother dead, entrusted to the care of a family friend while her father fought with the 101st Airborne in Iraq. The youngster was intelligent, friendly and engaging, and developed close bonds with many of the newsroom staff.
Then a week ago came the news that her father had been killed in Iraq.
Every war casualty leaves a trail of pain, but the story of a 10-year-old girl losing her only parent to the war is particularly poignant, and the Chicago Tribune showed interest.
In the course of checking out the details, a troubling problem appeared: The story wasn't true. What began as a nightmarish possibility became impossible to deny. There was no record with the Department of Defense of the death.
The father who was called Dan Kennings was not killed in Iraq. We checked with central command in Baghdad. There was no Dan Kennings in the 101st Airborne. No Dan Kennings in the entire Army.
We checked with Cathy Gramling, media relations officer at Fort Campbell, Ky., who in turn checked with the Army Human Resources Command.
"We cannot find a record of a Dan Kennings on active duty or having been killed in Iraq," Gramling said.
She directed us to a Web site maintained by the military, listing all the casualties from Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and the attack on the Pentagon. No Dan Kennings.
We had been duped.
Not only was he not in the military, we could not verify he existed at all. Suddenly, everything about this story was in question.
Over the course of a year and a half, we published news stories, columns and letters to the editor about Dan Kennings and his daughter Kodee. All of them were rich in real human emotion, and all provided moving details in the life of a young girl trying to live her life without her parents. They portrayed a precocious child, fiercely proud of her father's military service.
Each one of these stories, columns and letters contained an essential inaccuracy -- but when we published them we believed them to be true.
How could this happen?
We blew it.
There is no pleasant way to put it. We didn't check the facts carefully. We believed what we were told without verifying. We weren't as skeptical as we are supposed to be. We were fooled by a little girl with a cute smile, surrounded by a group of adults who acted the hoax with her.
We published unverified assertions, and they turned out to be false. For that, we apologize to our readers.
The basis of journalism is truth. Not partial truth, but 100 percent truth on every page, in every story. As it says in our mission statement, we are committed to being a trusted source of news. In this case, we failed.
Admitting this, however, is not enough.
We also retract all the stories and commentary concerning Kodee and Dan Kennings, people we now know never existed, and we pledge to redouble our efforts to regain and keep your trust.
Second story, linked at the bottom of the above
How do you Spellcheck Heiroglyphics?
"We weren't as skeptical as we are supposed to be."
They so desperately wanted it to be true that they avoided finding facts that didn't fit the agenda.
ping
Who said party schools' are long gone. Looks to me like they're all 'still on the pipe' down there.
While sittin' on a po'ch one day, a yo'ng blonde woomin was warin' her on oversized maroon sweater an' jeans.
Someone axed her whuffo' she had done whut she did, cuss it all t' tarnation.
Now this hyar yo'ng blonde woomin lacked fo' attenshun an' was offered a oppo'tuity t'play a role in a hoax.
When th' yo'ng blonde woomin had doubts about her role, th' blonde woomin axed fo' a re-write. Th' direcko' of course refused an' thrett uped t'cast someone else.
Th' yo'ng blonde woomin commenced t'make 3 dozen phone calls, accidentally phonin' th' media of which yo' is readin' th' results
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471205/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471444/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471700/posts
Mzzzz. Reynolds has a bright future with the Associated Press. She's Editor material for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.