I like Linda Chavez, but this is a lame article. Because she did not know Gorelick's CV, everyone else is probably wrong on some "facts" as well? The Washington Times has reporters who write really inside stuff about the Pentagon. Are they being asked by their sources to dampen this Able Danger story? Did they outsource this negative article to someone not connected to military reporting? If so, it is weird thinking.
And so the cover-up by the msm for Clinton continues.
Bimp.
I think it's pretty obvious that's exactly what's going on. It will be interesting to see who is dishonest enough and weak enough to go along with it.
<< I like Linda Chavez .... >>
Do you like Armstrong Williams, too?
I used to like them both, too and as often as not gave each the benefit of any doubt I felt about anything either had to say. Until each in his turn, "blew it."
Like Armstrong, Chavez was long-ago compromised by her own actions. Now being restored to [East-Coast "Establishment"] popularity tends more-and-more to drive her.