To: Sal
There should have been at least a DOD institutional memory of Able Danger that should have passed from one administration to the other. IMHO, staff level officers kept their mouths shut during transition and have now been promoted to positions of power. A through outing of who knew what when and why it didn't pass over would totally destroy military careers of powerful people. The folks in power are not about to let that happen.
19 posted on
08/27/2005 5:41:41 AM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Can we swap Cindy Sheehan in Crawford for Cindy Crawford anywhere?)
To: gov_bean_ counter
A through outing of who knew what when and why it didn't pass over would totally destroy military careers of powerful people. The folks in power are not about to let that happen. You're probably right. OTOH Dan Rather was once considered a powerful man backed by a powerful organization. OTOOH half of the powerful people were not supporting Danny Boy at that time.
Nevertheless, I hope we get the name of that 2-star general who squashed the info and made sure the FBI didn't get it even when they were ready to accept it.
We have a large number of really good researchers and investigators at FR. Some of them are retired LEOs. That 2-star has to be exposed and driven out along with whoever appointed him/her and was allied with him/her.
24 posted on
08/27/2005 6:13:43 AM PDT by
Sal
(Jamie Gorelick--a major Omissioner in the 9/11 Omission.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson