Skip to comments.
Woman files suit over police demand for her identification
Salt Lake Tribune ^
| 8/26/2005
| Pamela Manson
Posted on 08/26/2005 4:37:24 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
It's good to see the cops hassling pedestrians that are not suspects in any wrongdoing and providing other useful public services. Can I hire this guy to come over and kick my dog, too?
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Why did they want her info?
2
posted on
08/26/2005 4:39:32 PM PDT
by
garyhope
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Somewhere someone once told me that a cop does not need probable cause to ask for identification.
What I don't remember is if they need probable cause to "insist" on identification.
3
posted on
08/26/2005 4:40:12 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I hope she breaks these thugs' backs. Talk about abuse of power ...
4
posted on
08/26/2005 4:40:37 PM PDT
by
IronJack
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Can I hire this guy to come over and kick my dog, too?
If he did, there probably wouldn't be much you could do
about it.
5
posted on
08/26/2005 4:40:49 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The police deserves to lose money just for having their officer hassle a pedestrian who by his own admission, did not suspect that person of committing a crime. If I don't commit a crime, its none of the police's business who I am or what I am doing. Its still supposed to be a free country.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
6
posted on
08/26/2005 4:41:09 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It sounds like unreasonable hassling to me at first reading, but obviously there is a lot of information not included in this story, such as what was going on that caused the officer to seek to identify the photographer.
7
posted on
08/26/2005 4:42:45 PM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: coconutt2000
They don't even have probable cause here much less than suspicion. A police officer can't arbitrarily demand identification from someone who he knows hasn't committed a crime. Last time I checked, America wasn't a police state.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
8
posted on
08/26/2005 4:43:28 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Whats gonna do whats gonna do when they come for you. Bad Cop bad Cop.
9
posted on
08/26/2005 4:43:33 PM PDT
by
zipp_city
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Hope the guy gets taken down so he cant do this again. What a Nazi.
Papers Please!
10
posted on
08/26/2005 4:43:42 PM PDT
by
Windsong
(FighterPilot)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Where I live the PD runs CIBRs on everybody they come in contact with. Pitiful
11
posted on
08/26/2005 4:45:37 PM PDT
by
UB355
To: jimtorr
Based on what? Standing on a street corner? Like the story says, the officer didn't even have suspicion of a crime. And the poor woman still has a criminal accusation on her record. How would you like that happening to you? As far I'm concerned, what occurred was official abuse of authority under color. The police aren't always infallible and they do pick on people if they think they can get away with it.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12
posted on
08/26/2005 4:46:22 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
How about the "wanted subjects" board during briefing? Might she not have looked like a suspect under investigation? Someone on the "missing" board?
A cop (any citizen) has a right to ask another for ID. You also have the right to refuse, but depending on the circumstances, you have to deal with the consequences.
It is not considered an invasion of privacy.
13
posted on
08/26/2005 4:46:24 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I predict she will lose. Even if it gets to the Supremes. they ruled last year on stops in a motor vehicle. Now they will seal this crack in the law.
14
posted on
08/26/2005 4:46:57 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Left unanswered: Is this an illegal immigrant we're talking about?
15
posted on
08/26/2005 4:47:45 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Hey Senator! Leave those kids alone!)
To: UB355
Guilty before being considered innocent. Of course traffic stops may or may not have anything to do with your having broken a law. The cop may decide he needs you to fulfill his day's quota and you're good as screwed since you know its his word against yours.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
16
posted on
08/26/2005 4:48:30 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Already been done. Already been to SCOTUS. Already been lost.
We're done.
papersplease.org
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I need more info before I can blame the cops here. One, what is the area like? If its a high crime area, or one with prostitution present, then maybe the officer had some reason to do this.
I do not trust the media to give all the details. There are some serious questions that need to be answered before can say which side is in the wrong.
It very well may be the officer overstepped his bounds. The fact that the officers supervisor backed him up leads me to think there was some reason for the request.
I guess the courts will work it all out, like it should.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
This sort of reminds me of those old black and white movies where the German Gestapo agent walks up to the hero and says "papers please".
19
posted on
08/26/2005 4:50:05 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: mad_as_he$$
Yes, of course. Big Brother wants to know what we're up to 24 hours a day.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
20
posted on
08/26/2005 4:50:11 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson