Posted on 08/26/2005 2:58:43 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
WASHINGTON, Aug. 25 - A long-awaited C.I.A. inspector general's report on the agency's performance before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks includes detailed criticism of more than a dozen former and current agency officials, aiming its sharpest language at George J. Tenet, the former director, according to a former intelligence officer who was briefed on the findings and another government official who has seen the report.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Finally!
Amen!
Dig!!!!
To this day I have never been able to figure out why Bush kept Tenet in place as long as he did.
They sure tried, but for some reason it just didn't seem to be sticking to Bush so they dropped it.
because 41 was the DCI under Ford and has strong thoughts that the DCI shouldn't be political. Besides that, Clinton didn't even know who Tenet was. Bush was giving his subordinate the benefit of the doubt, as all good leaders do when lacking hard evidence to the contrary. Eventually, it was a systematic change that had to take place and that's when Tenet left. You can't just automatically fire someone and then expect loyalty from the next guy - and they had para-military dudes in Afghanistan or Iraq dying almost as soon as the dust settled. Bush respects the CIA, as he and all Presidents should, and he was doing his part as a boss. That's my take.
Or why he awarded him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom (IIRC). Big tome f*ck *p.
tome = time (DOH!)
It's a far stretch to think that Bush wasn't aware of the major failures of the CIA under Tenet, while us nobodies out here in cyberland figured it out a long time ago.
***You can't just automatically fire someone and then expect loyalty from the next guy**
The Clintons did it regularly and they got that loyalty too.Even after they were fired they refused to talk. Of course fear of death might have had something to do with that.
the afgan special ops is what i hear.
". . . includes detailed criticism of more than a dozen former and current agency officials. . ."
Is Valerie Plame Wilson on the list?
I also thought it was because he had Rummy at DEFENSE, and Tenet could keep the liberals occupied.
Tenet must have had a special contract....read,....'contact'...?
but.......later he was!
This a leak to the NY Times.
Which first means it came from a democrat (a leak after all) and secondly it is the NY Times.
ie. disregard whatever this report says.
To keep him (Tenet) from making future statements critical of the Administration.
IMHO.....................THAT...was a 'high profile'.....'fishing trip'....!!!
But,.....what do i know?
(? Where are those... THREE [3]... 'SH'...."Mystery U.N. Cargo Ships"...???)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.